Here are the official results from the Santa Clara County Registrar:

• Remember what goes around, comes around.  You only reap what you sow with your own hands.
• You may be able to intimidate voters at the MCA to shove your agenda down people's throats, but that will never work on the Santa Clara City Council or anywhere else.
• If you genuinely want to serve in public office, make sure you clean up your own backyard first.
• To Nadeem's endorsers from outside Santa Clara, let him run on your City Council.
• If you cannot uphold the MCA Constitution yourselves, why should people trust you to uphold anything?
• The more you act like this never happened, the more people will find more about it.  It is your choice.
• Remember: if you return, we shall return - that is a promise:   

Mohammed Nadeem, the former President of the Muslim Community Association (MCA), is running for Santa Clara City Council 2012.  Nadeem omitted some information from his public disclosure to Santa Clara voters.  We will help jog his memory with the following questions and provide the corresponding evidence for voters to verify:

• In 2010, Nadeem listed his first name by initial on the ballot and omitted the MCA from his track record listing it only as some “non-profit” organization.  The question is: why?  What has he got to hide?
• Nadeem was investigated by his own community for Favoritism and Obstruction of Justice.  He resigned before the end of his term to abort the investigation.  Want to confirm this information?  Just ask him if there were any investigations pending against him towards the end of his term and why he resigned before completing his term.  Let him deny this information in public.
• The MCA’s Constitution discriminates against women.  Want to verify this information.  Check out Articles V and VI that stipulate:

• Isn't it ironic that Nadeem is defeated by a candidate defying the above article?  Would Nadeem have been MCA's President without the above exclusion?
• The question to Nadeem is: what did you do to change that during your tenure at the MCA?  Do you know it only took 10 signatures to put amendments for the MCA Community to vote on?  Do you know the MCA Community put two sets of amendments during Nadeem’s tenure that were shot down by the clan behind his MCA presidency?  Nadeem never showed up at any of the proposed amendment votes.  Here are the proposed first and second proposed amendments that Nadeem refused to participate in.  Check out the Amendment #5 of the second round of amendments.  Why would Nadeem refuse to vote for an amendment that prohibits discrimination, favoritism and conflict of interest?
• The proposed amendments Nadeem worked on made no attempt to remove the articles mentioned above.  Article 13 says MCA’s Constitution needs better guidelines for cash handlings.  Could this by why the IRS is investigating MCA’s financials?
• In an independent investigation of MCA Board, the judges ruled unanimously to have the School’s Principal and Vice Principal re-evaluated by an independent third party:

            

• The questions to Nadeem are:
• Have these rulings been enforced?
• What is the relationship between the investigated Principal and his nominators?
• More important: isn’t it a conflict of interest for Nadeem to block this ruling to cover up for his nominators?  Is this why he resigned before the end of his term before the word gets out?
• In MCA’s newsletter, MCA’s Imam (religious leader) declared the following:    

       

•  Could that have anything to do with the investigations Nadeem blocked during his tenure at the MCA?
• According to Santa Clara Weekly, Nadeem is now a member of the Rotary Club.  Did he disclose that fact to his own community?
• According to Santa Clara’s Candidate Financial Disclosure by Nadeem:
• Half of his donors are from outside Santa Clara.  Why?
• Would Nadeem care to disclose the affiliation of some of his donors like Kamal Koraitem and Samer Darwish?  Does the Muslim Brotherhood hiding behind the fictiuous name Muslim American Society (MAS) ring a bell?  In fact weren’t these two particular people directly involved in blocking all investigations against MAS at the MCA?
• For Nadeem to claim he stands for transparency is a joke.  Are you serious?  Do you really want people to believe you were democractically elected at the MCA?  Does this image ring a bell?  How many candidates did you compete with?  None?  How many people voted for you?  Could it be less than 50 out of 5,000+ Community?  Could you show people evidence otherwise?  Is this why you had your names removed from the MCA website?